Quadrant news Casus & Research Login The dentists About us Quadrant products

 
 

Home


Quadrant news

Quadrant Anterior Shine excels in long-term clinical study!Quadrant Anterior Shine: Excellent!Quadrant Anterior Shine ? Natural aesthetics restoredImproved Quadrant composite capsulesNEW by Cavex
The QUAST Quadrant Anterior Shine Tool
The myth of composite filler contentTo be NANO or not to be NANO?Cavex Holland BV
Re-certification by TUV Rheinland 0197
A new, broader look at the factor ShineNew: Quadrant Universal LC, with Fluorescence pigment




link naar cavex site
 
   
 

   
 
 

The myth of composite filler content

The Quadrant composites are mainly known because of their high aesthetic quality. By using barium glass technique and by adding fluorescence pigment, Quadrant Anterior Shine and Quadrant Universal LC have an unprecedented natural and lively appearance. Many people have the impression that a high aesthetic quality is often achieved at the expense of the strength of the material, but in the case of Quadrant, strength and beauty actually goes hand in hand. However, in order to prove this, the measurement of the filler content needs to be objectively determined.

Making a comparison of the filler content in different composites is extremely difficult. This is complicated further by the fact that the values manufacturers provide for the filler contents (w/w %) are not always equally reliable. Manufacturers often create the impression that the composites are highly filled because the perceptions of strength and durability are positively related.

One of the reasons that composites cannot be easily compared has to do with the silanation of the fillers. Before the fillers are incorporated into the monomer matrix, they are provided with a thin layer of silane. This is done to improve attachment and to prevent separation. Very often, the quantity of the silane in the indicated filler weight is not corrected, whereas the silane should really be attributed to the monomer content.

Anterior composites
A reliable method to determine the actual percentages of the filler is to combust the composite. The monomers are then burnt, after which only pure filler remains (Ash%). In the diagram below, we compare different anterior composites.

Anterior composites

 

 

 

 

 

Durafill

Heraeus Kulzer

56

52

Anterior

Microfine

SiO2

Silux

3M/ESPE

56

55

Anterior

Microfine

SiO2

A110

3M/ESPE

56

55

Anterior

Microfine

SiO2

Quadrant Anterior Shine

Cavex Holland BV

74

59

Anterior

Micro-hybrid

BaAL glass

Bright

Kuraray

82

59

Anterior

Hybrid

Quartz

Product

Manufacturer

w/w %

Ash %

Indication

Type

Filler

This diagram shows that in all cases a higher weight percentage (w/w %) is indicated by the manufacturers. If we compare the actual values, we see that Quadrant Anterior Shine (QAS) scores very well. In this regard, it should also be noted that Bright, for example, is filled with quartz, which has a higher density, which means that Quadrant Anterior Shine actually has the highest filler material content.

Universal composites
If we compare the universal composites with one another, we see that the weight percentages indicated by the manufacturers vary from 73% to 87%. This shows a clear distinction between composites based upon BaAI-glass variants and the quartz-zirconium group.

Universal composites

 

 

 

 

 

Charisma classic

Heraeus Kulzer

75

75

Universal

Hybrid

BaAL glass

Quadrant Universal LC

Cavex Holland BV

75

75

Universal

Hybrid

BaAL glass

Point 4

Kerr

76

73

Universal

Hybrid

BaAlSi-glass

Spectrum TPH

Dentsply

77

75

Universal

Hybrid

BaAL glass

Esthet-X

Dentsply

77

73

Universal

Hybrid

BaAL glass

Herculite

Kerr

78

77

Universal

Hybrid

BaAlSi-glass

Charisma 2

Heraeus Kulzer

78

75

Universal

Hybrid

BaAL glass

Venus

Heraeus Kulzer

78

78

Universal

Hybrid

BaAL glass

Tetric Ceram

Vivadent

80

76

Universal

Hybrid

BaAL glass

Z100

3M/ESPE

84

79

Universal

Hybrid

Zirkoniumsilicaat

Z250

3M/ESPE

85

78

Universal

Hybrid

Zirkoniumsilicaat

Product

Manufacturer

w/w %

Ash %

Indication

Type

Filler

Manufacturer information and Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2004 31; 1090-1101

“Characterization of the inorganic fraction of resin composites” -  J Sabbagh et al.


On average, the BaAI-glass variants have about 75% filler after combustion. The average for the weight percentages for the quartz/zirconium group lies around 83%. Again, the higher density determines the difference. Besides, major disadvantages of the quartz/zirconium are an increased wear to the antagonists and the fact that they cannot be polished to such a high gloss.

In conclusion, we can therefore confidently state that with the Composites Quadrant Anterior Shine and Quadrant Universal LC, Cavex has succeeded in producing composites with a very high aesthetic quality without making any concessions to the strength of the material. The aesthetic quality of the material is not only determined by the filler content, but mainly by the technologies applied.

Quadrant Anterior Shine         Quadrant Universal LC